Skip to content

Irresponsible ‘Multi-verse’ Theorizing/ Fantasizing

May 27, 2019

Is speculation in multiverses as immoral as speculation in subprime mortgages?

By John Horgan on 

I’m becoming a moralistic prig in my dotage. Someone dear to me just proudly told me that her son, a freshly minted Harvard grad, is training to be an investment banker. This privileged young man, I grumbled, should try to make the world a better place rather than playing in a rigged, high-stakes gambling racket.

I apologized later—and vowed privately to be less self-righteous in my judgments of others’ career choices. After all, I ain’t exactly Gandhi. But then I read Brian Greene’s new book, The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos (Knopf, 2011), and my moral hackles got all quivery again.
(Weird coincidence alert: In 2006, the publisher RiskDoctor, Inc., released a book titled Options Trading: The Hidden Reality.)

A physicist at Columbia University, Greene is an immensely talented science explicator who has brought physics to the masses through his smart, witty bestsellers, The Elegant Universe (turned into a television series narrated by Greene) and The Fabric of the Cosmos.

My beef with Greene is this: He has become a cheerleader for the descent of theoretical physics into increasingly fantastical speculation, disconnected from the reality that we can access empirically. Greene has argued eloquently for the plausibility of string theory, which (as I pointed out in a previous post) postulates the existence of particles that are far too small to be detected in any conceivable experiment.

In his new book Greene takes us even further away from reality, asking us to consider not just hypothetical particles but entire universes that lie beyond the reach of our instruments. Multiverses are old hat, of course. In a 1990 article for Scientific American on cosmology I included a sidebar, “Here a universe, there a universe…,” about speculation that our universe “is only one in an infinitude of cosmos.”

My tone was lightly mocking, because cosmologists themselves seemed to be kidding—even embarrassed—when they talked about all these alternate universes. But now Greene—as well as Stephen Hawking, Leonard Susskind, Sean M. Carroll and other prominent physicist/popularizers—want us to take multiverses seriously.

In Hidden Reality Greene notes that different theories of modern physics yield many different multiverse theories. One of the oldest is the many-worlds theory, which conjectures that all of the possible histories of our world allowed for by quantum mechanics are realized in other universes.

Greene also touts the inflationary multiverse, which holds that new universes are constantly springing into existence via a mysterious anti-gravity force called inflation. String theory yields the brane multiverse; strings plus inflation produces the landscape multiverse; and that still leaves us with the quilted, cyclic, holographic and simulated multiverses, all of which Greene cheerfully elucidates.

These multiverse theories all share the same fundamental defect: They can be neither confirmed nor falsified. Hence, they don’t deserve to be called scientific, according to the well-known criterion proposed by the philosopher Karl Popper. Some defenders of multiverses and strings mock skeptics who raise the issue of falsification as “Popperazis”—which is cute but not a counterargument. Multiverse theories aren’t theories—they’re science fictions, theologies, works of the imagination unconstrained by evidence.

At their best, science fiction and theology can leave us awestruck before the unutterable strangeness and vastness of the cosmos. Multiverse theories used to arouse these emotions in me. When the Russian physicist Andrei Linde—one of the inventors of the inflation theory of cosmic creation—first explained his chaotic, self-reproducing, fractal, inflationary multiverse theory to me 20 years ago, my reaction was, “Wow! That’s so cool!”

Multiverse theories don’t turn me on anymore. Perhaps it’s because of 9/11 and all its bloody consequences, especially the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Also, I have two teenage kids, and I’m worried about the enormous problems they’re inheriting from my generation.

Now, multiverse theories strike me as not only unscientific but also immoral, for two basic reasons: First, at a time when we desperately need science to help us solve our problems, it’s irresponsible for scientists as prominent as Greene to show such a blithe disregard for basic standards of evidence.
Second, like religious visions of paradise, multiverses represent an escapist distraction from our world.

I find two multiverse concepts especially loathsome. One is the idea that an infinite universe contains infinite copies of our world. Greene writes that in another cosmos “your doppelganger is now reading this sentence, along with you. In others…he or she has, well, a less than felicitous disposition and is someone you’d rather not meet in a dark alley.”

Even worse is the proposition that our world is artificial, a simulation being run on a computer designed by an alien civilization. This sort of adolescent claptrap devalues our reality even more than heaven, Valhalla, nirvana and other ancient fantasies do.

Is theorizing about parallel universes as immoral as betting on derivatives based on subprime mortgages? I wouldn’t go that far. Nor do I think all scientists should be seeking cures for cancer, more efficient solar cells or other potential boons to humanity. But scientists should, at the very least, investigate the world in which we live rather than worlds that exist—as far as we will ever know—only in their imaginations.

~     ~     ~     ~     ~

Also see:

The Fine-Tuning of the Universe, Solar System and Earth

* Another Fun RSR List Show: In  our List of the Fine-Tuned Features of the Universe, Real Science Radio host Bob Enyart quotes leading scientists and their astounding admission of the uncanny and seemingly never-ending list of the just-perfect finely tuned parameters of the physical features of the Earth, the solar system, and the entire cosmos. This program is brought to you by God, maker of heaven and earth and other fine products!

* The Finely Tuned Parameters of the Universe: Barrow & Tipler, in their standard treatment, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, admit that “there exist a number of unlikely coincidences between numbers of enormous magnitude that are, superficially, completely independent; moreover, these coincidences appear essential to the existence of carbon-based observers in the Universe.” Examples include the wildly unlikely combination of:
– there is the same number of electrons as protons to a standard deviation of one in ten to the thirty-seventh power, that is, 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (37 zeros)
– the 1-to-1 electron to proton ratio throughout the universe yields our electrically neutral universe
– all fundamental particles of the same kind are identical (including protons, electrons, down quarks, etc., even, in QED, photons!)
– energy exactly equals mass (times the conversion factor of c²)
– the electron and the massively greater proton have exactly equivalent opposite charges

– the electron to proton mass ratio (1 to 1,836) is perfect for forming molecules
– the baryon (protons, neutrons, etc.) that decays must conserve the number of baryons
– the free neutron decays in minutes whereas it is stable within the nuclei of all the non-radioactive elements (otherwise eventually only hydrogen would exist because the strong nuclear force needs neutrons to overcome proton repulsion)
– the proton can’t decay because it is the lightest baryon (otherwise all elements would be unstable)
– the electromagnetic and gravitational forces are finely tuned for the stability of stars
– the gravitational and inertial mass equivalency
– the electromagnetic force constant is perfect for holding electrons to nuclei
– the electromagnetic force is in the right ratio to the nuclear force
– the strong force if changed by 1% would destroy all carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and heavier elements
– all electrons in the universe are identical as are all instances of each fundamental particle
– etc., etc., etc. (including the shocking apparent alignment of the universe with the orbit of the Earth)

* The Finely Tuned Parameters of the Solar System include:
– Our Sun is positioned far from the Milky Way’s center in a galactic Goldilocks zone of low radiation
– Our Sun placed in an arm of the Milky Way puts it where we can discover a vast swath of the entire universe
– Our Sun is in the unusual Local Bubble, 300 light years of extremely diffuse gas, 1/500th of the average
– Earth’s orbit is nearly circular (eccentricity ~ 0.02) around the Sun providing a stability in a range of vital factors
– Earth’s orbit has a low inclination keeping its temperatures within a range permitting diverse ecosystems
– Earth’s axial tilt is within a range that helps to stabilize our planet’s climate
– the Moon’s mass helps stabilize the Earth’s tilt on its axis, which provides for the diversity of alternating seasons
– the Moon’s distance from the Earth provides tides to keep life thriving in our oceans, and thus, worldwide
– the Moon’s nearly circular orbit (eccentricity ~ 0.05) makes its influence extraordinarily reliable
– the Moon is 1/400th the size of the Sun, and at 1/400th its distance, enables educational perfect eclipses
– the Earth’s distance from the Sun provides for great quantities of life and climate-sustaining liquid water
– the Sun’s extraordinary stable output of the energy
– the Sun’s mass and size are just right for Earth’s biosystem
– the Sun’s luminosity and temperature are just right to provide for Earth’s extraordinary range of ecosystems
– the color of the Sun’s light from is tuned for maximum benefit for our plant life (photosynthesis)
– the Sun’s low “metallicity” prevents the destruction of life on Earth
– etc., etc., etc.

and a whole lot more, -with a great number of links   Real Science Radio  RSR

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: